IMTIYAZ ALI WANI v. DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER KASHMIR AND ORS. (REVENUE(State Government)
WP(C)/3102/2025 · 2025-12-12
Rajesh Sekhri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12620 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12620 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 104 Supp List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 3102/2025 CM(8293/2025 IMTIYAZ ALI WANI ….. Petitioner(s) Through: -
Mr. Gowhar Majid Dalal, Advocate with Mr. Ibrahim Mehraj, Advocate.
V/s DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER KASHMIR AND ORS.
….. Respondent(s) Through:-
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
(ORDER)
12.12.2025.
1. Petitioner claims to be recorded owner in possession of land measuring 05 Kanals and 16 marlas falling under Khasra No. 3694/202 (04 Kanals 12 marlas) and Khasra No. 5761/3696/204 (03 Kanals 04 marlas), situate at Machbawan (Mattan-Shamsiora Road), Mattan, District, Anantnag. Petitioner is aggrieved of Order No. TM/OQ/2025-26/350 dated 30.10.2025, annexure-I to the present petition, passed on a complaint, preferred by one Aforz Ahmad Shaial, vide which Tehsildar, Anantnag has written to the Assistant Executive Engineer, Irrigation Sub-Division, Bawan, for demarcation and removal of encroachment.
2. It is contention of the petitioner that respondents in the garb of aforesaid
order intend to interfere with proprietary land of the petitioner without affording an opportunity of being heard to him.
3. Having regard to the limited nature of controversy, the present petition is
disposed of with a direction to respondents to treat the present writ petition as representation and accord consideration to the same within a
period of four weeks from the date copy of this order along with copies of writ petition and annexures are made available, after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Till then impugned order dated 30th October, 2025, shall remain in abeyance and parties shall maintain status-quo, qua the subject land.
4. Disposed of alongwith connected CM(s).
5. In view of urgency expressed by learned counsel for the petitioner, copy of this order be provided to him under the seal and signature of Bench Secretary today itself.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
SRINAGAR
12.12.2025.
“Abdul Rashid”