VINOD UPRETI ALIAS BANTY UPRETI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME DEHRADUN
C482/2074/2022 · 2025-07-21
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12618 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12618 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
C482 No.2074 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. T.P.S. Takuli, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA along with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant at bar submits that after trial the applicant has been acquitted, therefore, this C482 application has become infructuous.
4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present C482 application has rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as such.
5. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
21.07.2025 AK