SMT. SALONI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/1782/2025 · 2025-03-03
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126179 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126179 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12559-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1782 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Saloni And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have prayed for issuance of mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to harass the petitioners and interfere in their peaceful married life.
3. Petitioners claim to have married each other of their own volition and also claim that on the date of their marriage i.e. 20.01.2025, they were of marriageable age. The marriage certificate dated 20.01.2025 issued by the Arya Samaj Shivpuri Kamta, Chinhat, Lucknow is annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. Petitioner no.1 has annexed her High School Certificate and petitioner no.2 has annexed his Aadhar Card with regard to the proof of their age as Annexure no.2 to the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that petitioners are in the process of getting their marriage registered, which shall be done within a period of fifteen days. He further submits that there is no F.I.R. against the petitioners and they are not wanted in any criminal case, yet the police is harassing them at the behest of family members, who are not agreeable to the marriage. Therefore, this petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the opposite parties not to interfere in peaceful married life of the petitioners.
4. In view of the above, it is provided that if the petitioners have married each other and are living together, were of marriageable age on the date of their marriage and they are not wanted in any criminal case, then the police shall not unnecessarily interfere in their peaceful married life.
5. It is, however, made clear that this Court has not entered into nor adjudicated the age of the petitioners nor veracity/validity of the alleged marriage.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 3.3.2025/Praveen Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench