RAM KRIPAL AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. AGRICULTURE EDU. RESEARCH GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/2434/2025 · 2025-03-03
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126162 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126162 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12563 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2434 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Kripal And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Agriculture Edu. Research Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kripa Shankar Shukla,Ramesh Babu Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent No. 1 and Shri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3.
2. With the consent of the parties, the matter is being decided finally.
3. There is consensus at Bar that the matter in dispute is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court passed in Writ A No.692 of 2025 In Re Ram Kishor Yadav & Anr vs State of U.P. & Ors, decided on 21.01.2025.
4. At this stage Shri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3 states that this Court may indicate that the benefit of the this order would only be admissible to those persons who are still working and are getting the benefit of the 6th pay commission.
5. To the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by directing that the petitioners be entitled for the benefit of the judgment of this Court in the case of Ram Kishor Yadav (supra) provided they are still working and are in receipt of the benefit of the 6th Pay Commission. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench