Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12615 (KAR)

SMT REKHAMMA v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/337/2023 · 2025-04-22

Lok Adalath

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI & SMT. SHILPA RANI, MEMBER W.P.no.337/2023 (GM-CPC) (Lok Adalat No. 2717/2025) BETWEEN: SMT. REKHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O EREGOWDA, R/A NEAR CHAMUNDESWARI TEMPLE, SUBHASHANAGAR, HEBBAL, MYSURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI B.S. NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: THE COMMISIONER, MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, J.L.B. ROAD, MYSURU - 570 005. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI SACHIN V.R., ADVOCATE) 2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 02.11.2022 PASSED IN I.A.NO.VIII FILED BY THE PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF, UNDER ORDER 14 RULE 5 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, IN O.S.NO.725/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., AT MYSURU. THE TRUE COPY SUBMITTED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Sri V.R.Sachin, learned counsel for respondent has filed memo along with copy of judgment dated 29.08.2024 passed in O.S.no.725/2019 stating that writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Memo is taken on record. Writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER AV