1 2025:CGHC:12302 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 358 of 2024 1 - Dashrath Lal Kurre S/o Late Teej Ram I, Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Sendri, Tehsil And District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Complainant) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shri Subrat Roy Nag At Present, Project Director, National Highway Authority Of India, Project Implementation Unit Abhilash Parisar Behind New Bus Stand Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No. 2) 2 - Shri Ajay Kumar Dhal Then And Their, Project Director, National Highway Authority Of India, Project Implementation Unit Abhilash Parisar Behind New Bus Stand Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No. 2) 3 - Shri Suraj Kumar Sahu Then And Their, Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)/cum Land Acquisition Officer Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No. 4) 4 - Shri Piyush Tiwari At Present, Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Cum / Land Acquisition Officer Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No. 4) ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Shri Rupesh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent No.2 For Respondent No.3 & 4 : : Shri Dheeraj Wankhede, Advocate assisted by Shri Amitesh Anand Rathore, Advocate Shri Rakesh Jha, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 10/03/2025 The present petition has been filed alleging the non-compliance of the order dated 25.08.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(C). No. 993/2023 whereby the land of the petitioner has been acquired by the contemnor and land acquisition officer without proper proceeding fo the land acquisition and without consent of the petitioner and constructed the Pendridih-Pathrapali National Highway Road No. 111/130 on the land. The grievance of the petitioner has been decided by this Court vide order dated 25.08.2023 directing the respondent NO.4 to respond to the letters written by respondent No.2 dated 2.08.2023 and 11.08.2023 requesting for supply of additional material and documents in pursuance of the letter dated 20.06.202 expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Respondent No.2 was also directed to take necessary steps after receipt of details of land and other relevant materials from respondent No.4 expeditiously preferably within an outer limit of further two months thereafter. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that the order under challenge would be complied within two months and he has filed the relevant documents to this effect. 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the above submission and in support of which, the documents have been filed by the respondents, the order of this Court would be complied with and therefore at this stage, he may be permitted to withdraw this contempt petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that if the order is not complied within the said period, the petitioner would be at liberty to file petition afresh. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.03.18 10:48:31 +0530