Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 126131 (ALL)

RAM SEWAK SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

CRLA/716/2025 · 2025-03-04

Karunesh Singh Pawar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13141 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 716 of 2025 Appellant :- Ram Sewak Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Girdhari Lal Shukla,Seeta,Sumit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for appellant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. 2. The present appeal has been filed for quashing of the impugned summoning order dated 17.10.2024 as well as entire proceeding of Special Session Trial No.2392 of 2024, Computer Case No. UPLK010125872024 arising out of FIR No.0042 of 2024, under Sections 504/506 IPC and Section 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST Act, P.S. Qaisarbagh, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant, after arguing for some time, submits that present appeal may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. 4. In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the appellant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and applies for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra). 5. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench