Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 126122 (ALL)

SMT. MAMATA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/1745/2025 · 2025-02-28

Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12315-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1745 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Mamata And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajeet Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite parties and perused the record. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 3. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have prayed for issuance of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to harass the petitioners and interfere in their peaceful married life. 4. Petitioners claim to have married each other of their own volition and also claim that on the date of their marriage i.e. 20.02.2025, they were of marriageable age. The marriage certificate dated 20.02.2025 issued by the Arya Samaj Vardan Sewa Sansthan, Hardoi is annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. Petitioners have annexed PAN cards and and Aadhar cards as Annexure No.SA-1 in this regard as proof of age. He further says that there is no F.I.R. against the petitioners and they are not wanted in any criminal case yet the police is harassing them at the behest of family members who are not agreeable to the marriage. Therefore, this petition has been filed seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the opposite parties not to interfere in peaceful married life of the petitioners. 5. Learned counsel for petitioners also undertake to get the marriage of petitioners registered under the U.P. Marriages Registration Rules, 2017 within a period of four weeks. 6. In view of the above, it is provided that if the petitioners have married each other and are living together, were of marriageable age on the date of their marriage and they are not wanted in any criminal case then the police shall not unnecessarily interfere in their peaceful married life. 7. It is, however, made clear that this Court has not entered into nor adjudicated the age of the petitioners nor veracity/validity of the alleged marriage. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary J.) Order Date :- 28.2.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench