DHEERAJ SONKAR @ NEETU SONKAR AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/1917/2025 · 2025-03-03
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126121 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126121 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12635 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1917 of 2025 Applicant :- Dheeraj Sonkar @ Neetu Sonkar And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhupendra Nath Tripathi,Daya Shanker Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Daya Shanker Tripathi Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Shri Daya Shankar Tripathi, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 who has filed vakalatnama which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners were convicted by learned Court below vide judgment and
order dated 13.03.2023 in complaint case No. 628/2015, under Sections 498A/323/506 IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Kaiserganj, District Lucknow. Against the order dated 13.03.2023 the petitioners filed an appeal numbered as Appeal No. 62/2023 "Dheeraj Sonkar @ Neetu Sonkar and others Vs. State of U.P. which is pending before the Sessions Court. It has been further submitted that during pendency of the appeal, the parties have amicably resolved the dispute outside the Court by way of compromise which is on record as Annexure No. 6 to the petition and also filed a case under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow. Now the parties on the basis of the said compromise want to end the litigation arising out of complaint case No. 628/2015, under Section 498A/323/506 IPC read with Section 3/4 of D.P. Act. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for respondent no. 2 has no objection to this innocuous prayer. In view of the above the parties are directed to appear before the learned court below on 17.03.2025 along with the copy of
original compromise deed, who shall verify the compromise in presence of the parties within one week thereafter and keep a report of the verification on the record of the Court after providing its copies to the parties. For a period of two months, the proceedings of criminal appeal No. 62/2023 ""Dheeraj Sonkar @ Neetu Sonkar and others Vs. State of U.P.", pending before the Sessions Judge, Lucknow shall remain stayed. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of. Liberty to the parties is granted to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings on the basis of compromise and its verification. Office is directed to return the original compromise as well as certified copies of the documents filed along with the petition to
learned counsel for the petitioners as per Rules of the Court.
Order Date :- 3.3.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench