[2025:RJ-JP:13750] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4023/2025 1. Satnam Singh Vains S/o Shri Sadhu Singh, Aged About 77 Years, R/o Ruddh Pachgaon, P.s. Sadar, District Dholpur. At Present Residing At 1333 Prareri Rose Drive, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada. (Presently Confined In District Jail Dholpur). 2. Harbhajan Singh Vains S/o Shri Lakhha Singh, Aged About 77 Years, R/o Ruddh Pachgaon, P.s. Sadar, District Dholpur. At Presently Residing At 1709 North River Drive, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada. (Presently Confined In District Jail Dholpur). 3. Jasveer Singh Bhullar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Baba Bakala, Police Station Byas, District Amritsar (Punjab), Presently Residing At Folding, P.s. Jamsher Sadar District Jalandhar (Punjab) And 880 Rue Chez Nous, Kamloops British Columbia, Canada. (Presently Confined In District Jail Dholpur) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. V.R. Bajwa, Sr. Adv. Assisted by Ms. Savita Nathawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 26/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.131/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3) and 61(2)(a) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:13750] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4023/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the age of the petitioners are 77, 77 and 67 years respectively. It is admitted by the petitioners that the property in dispute is registered under the name of Sohan Singh. The Petitioner No.3 Jasveer Singh impersonated himself as Sohan Singh. It is also contended that no wrongful loss was caused to anyone. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time. There are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. The offences alleged against the petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the age of the petitioners and the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The petitioners has remained in custody since long and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Satnam Singh Vains S/o Shri Sadhu Singh, 2. Harbhajan Singh Vains S/o Shri Lakhha Singh and 3. Jasveer Singh Bhullar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, in connection with FIR [2025:RJ-JP:13750] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4023/2025] No.131/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur, District Dholpur, shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/217