Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12609 (GAU)

DIDAR MIRDHA v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 9 ORS.

WA/179/2024 · 2025-02-03

Suman Shyam

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010104932024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/179/2024 DIDAR MIRDHA S/O- LATE EANUSH MIRDHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MORANGAON, BORGANG, PO- BORGANG, P.S. AND MOUZA- BEHALI, DISTRICT- BISWANATH, ASSAM. VERSUS 1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 9 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT BHAWAN, 1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI- 110001. 2:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA G5 AND 6 SECTOR 10 DWARKA, NEW DELHI- 110075 (REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN). 3:THE REGIONAL MANAGER, NORTH EASTERN REGION THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA NEDFI HOUSE DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 4:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. (NHIDCL) PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI- 110001 (REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR). 5:THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CUM HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATIOR NHIDC LTD. GNB ROAD AMBARI GUWAHATI- 781001. 6:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Page No.# 2/2 DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 7:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND D.M. DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 06. 8:THE DEPUTY/ DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SONITPUR. 9:THE DEPUTY / DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BISWANATH. 10:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BISWANATH REVENUE CIRCLE BISWANATH For the Appellant(s) : Mr. S.K. Talukdar, Advocate. : Ms. T.K. Ovung, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Boro, Advocate on behalf of Mr. C. Baruah, Advocate for respondent Nos.2, 3, 4 & 5. : Ms. R.B. Bora, Junior Government Advocate, Assam for respondent Nos.8, 9 & 10. – BEFORE – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM 04.02.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) Mr. S.K. Talukdar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, on instruction, has submitted that he wants to withdraw this writ appeal. However, he seeks liberty to the appellant to avail appropriate remedy available under the law. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this writ appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant