RATAN LAL CONSTABLE (DRIVER) NO. 327 SON OF RAM SUKH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/4327/2025 · 2025-03-28
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12608 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12608 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:14354] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4327/2025 Ratan Lal Constable (Driver) No. 327 Son Of Ram Sukh, Aged About 61 Years, Worked With Office Of Superintendent Of Police, Bhilwara- Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Dgp, Rajasthan Police, Lal Kothi, Police Hq, Jaipur.
4. Superintendent Of Police, Bhilwara (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Vishwas Saini for Mr.MS Raghav For Respondent(s) : Mr.Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 28/03/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that controversy in the instant matter is squarely covered by the judgment passed in Banshi Lal Constable (Driver) Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.; SB Civil Writ Petition No.2856/2025, decided on 11th March, 2025 along with other connected writ petitions.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the present petition may be decided in the light of the above cited
judgment.
3. Learned Additional Advocate General – Mr.Bhuwnesh Sharma has raised no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
[2025:RJ-JP:14354] (2 of 2) [CW-4327/2025]
4. In view of above, the present petition is disposed of with the direction that the ratio encapsulated in Banshi Lal Constable (Driver) (supra) shall be made equally applicable qua the petitioner herein.
5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Preeti Asopa /103