Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 126062 (ALL)

DEV NARAYAN GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/2466/2025 · 2025-03-26

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17300 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2466 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dev Narayan Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Medical And Health Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Umesh Chandra Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) who has filed supplementary affidavit today in court, which is taken on record and learned Standing Counsel who has accepted notice on behalf of respondents. An application for amendment has been filed with the prayer that instead of Chief Medical Officer, Raebareli and Chief Treasury Officer, Raebareli, Chief Medical Officer, Amethi and Chief Treasury Officer, Amethi may be permitted to be incorporated in the array of parties. Application is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to make necessary amendment in the array of parties, as prayed, during course of day. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents to take necessary action to include name of Asha Gupta (widow daughter) in pension paper of petitioner as dependent as per G.O. dated 30.5.2014 with a further direction to them to take a decision on the application dated 18.7.2024, Annexure No.2. Learned counsel confines his prayer to the effect that the petitioner's pending representation in regard to the prayer made in the petition may be directed to be disposed of, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to respondent No.2 Chief Medical Officer, Amethi within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is preferred, the respondent No.2 shall consider it and pass appropriate speaking and reasoned order, as per law, within a further period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order along with representation. Order Date :- 26.3.2025 kkb/ Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench