MANOJ KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AND THRU. OFFICIATING CHAIRMAN/CHAIRMAN AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/2122/2025 · 2025-03-04
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126057 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126057 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12945 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2122 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Mishra Respondent :- State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission And Thru. Officiating Chairman/Chairman And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Mishra,Tara Chand Seth Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging an order dated 15.01.2025, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed.
3. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner had raised a consumer dispute, which was decided ex parte in favour of the petitioner. Subsequently, the execution filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed in default. The petitioner preferred an appeal against the said order dated 06.06.2024 before the State Consumer Forum. In the said, it was specifically stated that counsel for the petitioner had stated that he need not appear in the execution proceedings filed before the District Consumer Forum, as such, he did not appear. This aspect has not been considered by the State Consumer Forum in its order dated
15.01.2025.
4. Considering the fact that the execution is pending before the District Consumer Forum, the order dated 15.01.2025 as well as
order dated 06.06.2024 are quashed. The matter is remanded to the District Consumer Forum for execution in accordance with law.
5. The petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench