Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 126055 (ALL)

DEEPAK SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND OTHERS

CRLP/1760/2025 · 2025-03-03

Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12555-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1760 of 2025 Petitioner :- Deepak Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aakash Srivastava,Rinku Verma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record. 2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 20.02.2025, bearing F.I.R./Case Crime No.0089 of 2025, for the offence under Sections 309(6), 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), registered at Police Station Maurawan, District Unnao. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offences as alleged in F.I.R. have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest them, which is against the mandates of Code of Criminal Procedure. 4. Learned AGA states that Section 309(6) has been dropped during the course of investigation and Sections 315(2) and 352 of BNS have been added along with Section 351(3) BNS which is already in the FIR. 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioners, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another. 6. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra). Order Date :- 3.3.2025/Pks ( Brij Raj Singh, J.) ( Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench