AHIBARAN AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/2094/2025 · 2025-03-04
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126050 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126050 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13224 Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2094 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ahibaran And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Notice on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 4 has been accepted by the office of Chief Standing counsel. The petitioners prays for quashing of the order dated 23.12.2024 passed by District Magistrate Hardoi in Case No. 902/2020: State of U.P. Vs. Radha Krishan, under Section 128 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing at some length, could not dispute the fact that against the impugned
order dated 23.12.2024, the petitioners has remedy in terms of U.P. Revenue Code-2006. Accordingly, in view of the availability of statutory remedy, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition leaving it open for the petitioners to take recourse against the impugned order, as may be available to them in accordance with law. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. The petition is dismissed solely on the ground of availability of statutory remedy available to the petitioners.
Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench