Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12605 (GAU)

M/S. VRIDHI IRON AND STEELS v. ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. AND 3 ORS.

WP(C)/2775/2024 · 2025-08-10

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010105762024 2025:GAU-AS:10579 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2775/2024 M/S. VRIDHI IRON AND STEELS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM DULY REGISTERED UNDER THE PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT ESS ESS COMPLEX, 4TH FLOOR, S.J. ROAD, ATHGAON, GUWAHATI-781001, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, OWING A STEEL STRUCTURE MANUFACTURING FACTORY AT KATAMUR, SILA VILLAGE, P.O. CHANGSARI, GHY-781001, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. AND 3 ORS. A GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING DULY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT BIJULEE BHAWAN, PALTANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-781001, DULY REPRESENTED Y ITS CHIARMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2:THE AREA MANAGER/ ASSESSING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL REVENUE COLLECTION AREA-II APDCL JALUKBARI GHY-781014 ASSAM 3:TRIDIB KUMAR MAHANTA AREA MANAGER/ASSESSING OFFICER IRCA DIVISION APDCL JALUKBARI GHY-781014 ASSA Page No.# 2/2 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. K. Kejriwal, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K. P. Pathak, SC, APDCL BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 11.08.2025 Mr. K. P. Pathak, the learned Standing counsel for the APDCL submitted that pursuant to the settlement proposal submitted by the Petitioner which was earlier rejected has been reviewed by the Respondent Company and the settlement proposal has been accepted on 17.06.2025 and accordingly, orders have been passed in that regard. The said orders have been placed before this Court which are kept on record and marked with the letters “X” and “Y”. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that in view of the said orders being passed, the petitioner’s grievances have been duly redressed. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands closed as the grievances of the petitioner have been duly redressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant