RAJU AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE GOVT. LKO AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/2037/2025 · 2025-03-05
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126026 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126026 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13368-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2037 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raju And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Govt. Lko And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Pandey,Sandhya Bharti Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Sri Vinay Kumar Singh, Advocate has filed his power on behalf of the opposite party Nos.6, 7 and 8 today in the Court, which is taken on record. Heard. If the petitioners want demarcation, they should avail the remedy prescribed in the relevant statute unless there is any legal impediment. The Writ Petition, in such matters, is not a remedy. The Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench