RUP NARAYAN CHOUDHURY ALIAS ROOP NARAYAN CHOUDHURY ALIAS RUPNARAYAN CHOUDHURY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./4053/2025 · 2025-08-07
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12600 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12600 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:22230 )
-1- A.B.A. No. 4053 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 4053 of 2025
Rup Narayan Choudhury @ Roop Narayan Choudhury @ Rupnarayan Choudhury, aged about 55 years, son of late Hari Ram Choudhary, resident of Garw Basa, Gosaitola, P.O. Tatanagar, P.S. Bagbera, District-East Singhbhum
… Petitioner
-Versus- The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
-----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P.
-----
07/07.08.2025 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with C.C. Case No.220 of 2020, registered for the offence under Sections 92 and 96-A of Factories Act, 1948, pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been charged under Sections 92 and 96-A of the Factories Act and he has not received any summon, bailable warrant and non-bailable warrant. He further submits that the factory is being run on valid license, which is contained in Annexure-2 and that has been obtained after duly furnishing the license fee. He also submits that the statutory provisions made in the Factories Act has already been rectified by the petitioner.
3.
Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits that it has come in the impugned order that in spite of issuance of bailable and non- bailable warrant, the petitioner has not appeared before the learned Court.
4. Considering that the petitioner is having license and it has been pointed out that all eligible criteria prescribed under the Factories Act has been fulfilled by the petitioner, however, that will be decided in the trial and
( 2025:JHHC:22230 )
-2- A.B.A. No. 4053 of 2025
in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in connection with C.C. Case No.220 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Ajay/