SITARAM CHOUDHARY AND ANR v. STATE PANCHAYATI RAJ ORS
CW/1143/2018 · 2025-01-07
Avneesh Jhingan
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12598 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12598 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:949] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1143/2018
1. Sitaram Choudhary S/o Shri Jagdish Choudhary, R/o Ganeshpura, Post And Teh. Mojmabad, Distt. Jaipur.
2. Narayan Lal S/o Shri Ram Karan Jat, Aged about 59 years, R/o Village Kalyanpura, Post Seva, Teh. Mojmabad, Distt. Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj, Govt. Of Raja, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. District Collector, Jaipur
3. Divisional Commissioner, Division Jaipur, Jaipur
4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaipur
5. Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division Dudu, District Jaipur
6. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Jaipur, District Jaipur
7. Rameshwar Choudhary, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Mangalwada, Panchayat Samiti Dudu, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhinav Srivastava for Mr. Raghunandan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Udawat for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Order 07/01/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent developments during pendency of the writ petition, no cause of action survives for pursuing the petition. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/64