Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(8135/2025) in RP 49/2023 CM(8136/2025).
KHURSHID AHMAD MAGREY.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. P. S. Ahmad, Advocate.
VERSUS
MOHAMMAD AMAN BHAT.
…Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 07.04.2026 CM No. 8135/2025: 1) Reply in the instant application has not been filed in spite of the fact that notice was issued way back on 08.12.2025. 2) For the reasons stated in the application, coupled with what has been argued, and also in light of the fact that no objection has been filed till date by the respondent, an inference can be drawn that the respondents have no serious objection in allowing the said application. Accordingly, the same is allowed and the delay is condoned. 3) Accordingly, CM No. 8135/2025 stands disposed of. 4) Registry is directed to list the restoration application, i.e., CM No. 8136/2025, on 22nd April, 2026.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 07.04.2026 Bisma Jan. 02 Regular