Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12597 (AP)

PUVVADA BHASKARARAO v. VIZIANAGARAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

WP/8647/2025 · 2025-04-21

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010148612025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 8647/2025 Between: Puvvada Bhaskararao and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Vizianagaram Municipal Corporation and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAYAPROLU SRIKANTH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: 2 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.8647 of 2025 ORDER: 1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondent No.1 in issuing notices (5 Nos.) in R.O.C.No.296/2022/A1, dated 28.12.2024 and Endorsement in R.O.C.No.466/2025/A1, dated 20.02.2025 for Godowns bearing Assessment Nos.(1) 1093015789, bearing Door No.8-1, (2) 1093015224, bearing Door No.8-1-161, 162, (3) 1093015216, bearing Door No.8-1-151, (4) 10930330968, bearing Door No.8-1-147 and (5) 1093015225, bearing Door No.8-1-163, 164 and Endorsement in R.O.C.No.466/2025/A1, dated 20.02.2025, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. At the time of hearing, Sri I. Sai Gopi Manoj Krishna, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Rayaprolu Srikanth, learned counsel for the Petitioners submits the Petitioners intend to withdraw the Writ Petition and sought permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 21.04.2025 IS 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.8647 of 2025 Date: 21.04.2025 IS