Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12595 (GAU)

A S ENTERPRISE v. CHANDAN SARMA AND 3 ORS.

Cont.Cas(C)/283/2024 · 2025-05-27

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010104962024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/283/2024 A S ENTERPRISE ZOO NARENGI ROAD, GUWAHATI-21, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR ANIL CHANDRA SARKAR, S/O- LATE JAY CHANDRA SARKAR, R/O- HOUSE NO. 2, M TAMULI PATH, RANGAMAN NAGAR, P.S. BASISTHA, GUWAHATI- 40. VERSUS CHANDAN SARMA AND 3 ORS. THE COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PWRD, DISPUR, GHY-6. 2:SANJIB SHYAM THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (ROADS) ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3. 3:NRIPEN MEDHI THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWRD DIBRUGARH CHABUA-LAHOWAL KHOWANG AND TINGKHONGTERRITORIAL ROAD DIVISION DIBRUGARH DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN- 786001. 4:SARAT CHANDRA KALITA THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER Page No.# 2/2 PWRD JORHAT ELECTRICAL DIVISION JORHAT DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785001 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K R PATGIRI, MS CHITRALEKHA DAS,MS K BARMAN Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 28.05.2025 This case has been filed alleging non-compliance of the order dated 02.06.2023 passed in W.P. (C) No. 3015/2022 by this Court. Shri K.R. Patgiri, learned counsel for the petitioner has however informed that after filing of the case, the order in question has been complied with. In view of the aforesaid submission, this Court is of the opinion that there is no requirement to continue with this proceeding. Accordingly, contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant