Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 125939 (ALL)

SUMIRNA @ VINDUMATI @ SMT. SUMITRA v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/2124/2025 · 2025-03-04

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13144-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2124 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sumirna @ Vindumati @ Smt. Sumitra Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Communication New Delhi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Durgendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The petitioner is known by three names i.e. Sumirna, Vindumati and Smt. Sumitra. There is a proper format for withdrawal of money from the account maintained in the Post office, which the petitioner claims to be her and also that the money therein is also deposited by her. However, learned Standing counsel appearing for the Post office says that unless the application is submitted in proper format, she cannot be allowed to operate the account. The petitioner may approach the respondent No.3, who may get the facts verified and do the needful as per law as far as it may be permissible. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she will have to seek other remedies as such questions of fact relating to identity of petitioner cannot be seen under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Gurpreet Singh Digitally signed by :- GURPREET SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench