ASHOK KUMAR AGARWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. KARMIK LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/2460/2025 · 2025-03-03
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125923 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125923 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12622 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2460 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Agarwal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Karmik Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Govind Prasad Tripathi,Brijesh Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gaurav Mehrotra Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. by means of present writ petition the petitioner has sought a direction to the respondent no. 1 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 06.11.2024 pending before him and also prayed for a direction to respondents to provide arrears of pension form th date of retirement of the petitioner on 23.01.2023 along with interest taking into consideration the Government Order dated 29.04.2016 and Government Order dated 11.06.2020.
3. In this regard, it has been submitted that petitioner has given a representation dated 06.11.2024 to the respondent which is pending consideration and has not been decided so far.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 1 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 06.11.2024 (Annexure No. 1) in a time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondent for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 1 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 06.11.2024 (Annexure No. 1) by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law, expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 3.3.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench