- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7532 WP No. 1822 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 1822 OF 2019 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SMT. MUNIKALLAMMA, W/O LATE N. RAMANJANEYA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT NO.1 THIRUMALA RAO, GARDEN JAYAMAHAL, BENGALURU - 560 046, REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. SRIHARIDEV, SON OF LATE N. RAMANJANEYA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1 THIRUMALA RAO GARDEN, JAYAMAHAL, BENGALURU - 560 046. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTOSH S. GOGI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BENGALURU MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7532 WP No. 1822 of 2019 J.C. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AMIT DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER'S REPRESENTATION DATED 17.06.2013 FOR ISSUE OF TDR, THE COMPENSATION IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the second respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure–A. 2. In Annexure–A, the petitioner has requested the respondent to award compensation by issuance of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) or Alternate Land in respect of the land bearing Sy.Nos.9, 10 & 11 measuring 6 acres - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7532 WP No. 1822 of 2019 13 guntas situated in KG Baidrehalli which according to her encroached up on by the BBMP. 3. Learned counsel for the BBMP submits that, the said lands are the subject matter of an appeal before this Court in RFA No.513/2018 and therefore, they cannot take any decision on the said representation. 4. In the light of the said submission, the BBMP is directed to consider the said representation and inform the petitioner about its inability to take any action on her representation in the light of the pending RFA. Petition is therefore disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46 CT: BHK