SMT. GHASITA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/2049/2025 · 2025-03-03
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125897 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125897 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12491-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2049 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Ghasita Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The petitioner seeks implementation/execution of the orders passed by the Addl. Commissioner (Judicial & Administration), Lucknow Division, Lucknow. The Revenue Authorities themselves are competent to implement/execute such orders. If these are executable orders, then proceedings for execution can be initiated. Let the petitioner do the needful, whereupon the concerned Revenue Court shall do look into the matter and do the needful as per law, but with expedition. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she may file a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. With the above observations/directions this writ petition is
disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.)
Order Date :- 3.3.2025 A.Nigam Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench