Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 125849 (ALL)

RAM MANOHAR v. U.P. JAL NIGAM (URBAN) THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR, LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/2385/2025 · 2025-02-28

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12061 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2385 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Manohar Respondent :- U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Managing Director, Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Chandra,Bisen Harshita,Ujjwal Sen Counsel for Respondent :- Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Shri Krishna Vishwakarma, Advocate holding brief of Shri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the competent authority for release of post retiral benefits along with interest thereof in view of the fact that petitioner has superannuated from service on 31.01.2024 and no dues certificate has also been issued to him. 3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to move a fresh representation before respondent No. 3 i.e. The Chief Accounts Officer, U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid reliefs, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 28.2.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench