M/S EASA ELEVATORS PVT. LTD. v. SONU KUMAR S/O RAMAVTAR
CW/4454/2025 · 2025-07-15
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12582 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12582 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:26243] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4454/2025 M/s EASA Elevators Pvt. Ltd., Industrial Plot No. G 1-604-605, RIICO Industrial Area, Khushkheda Tehsil Tijara, District-Alwar (Raj.) Through Factory Manager ----Petitioner Versus Sonu Kumar S/o Ramavtar, Age around 31 Years, R/o Village Khushkheda, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.) Employee Code No. 0072 ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4455/2025 M/s EASA Elevators Pvt. Ltd., Industrial Plot No. G 1-604-605, RIICO Industrial Area, Khushkheda Tehsil Tijara, District-Alwar (Raj.) Through Factory Manager ----Petitioner Versus Satyaveer S/o Shri Sibban, Age around 56 Years, R/o Village Post Katopur, Tehsil Kotkaasim, District-Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4761/2025 M/s EASA Elevators Pvt. Ltd., Industrial Plot No. G 1-604-605, RIICO Industrial Area, Khushkheda, Tehsil Tijara, District-Alwar, (Raj.) Through Factory Manager ----Petitioner Versus Sonu Kumar S/o Sarjeet Singh, Age around 27 Years, R/o Gram Post Machroli, Tehsil Kishangarhbas, District-Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. VeyanKatesh Garg For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
[2025:RJ-JP:26243] (2 of 2) [CW-4454/2025] Judgment / Order 15/07/2025 These writ petitions are filed seeking a direction to quash the proceedings pending before the learned Industrial Tribunal & Labour Court, Alwar (for brevity “the learned Labour Court”) in LCR Nos.29/2021: Sonu Kumar versus M/s EASA Elevators Pvt. Ltd., 31/2021: Satyaveer versus M/s EASA Elevators Pvt. Ltd. & 30/2021: Sonu Kumar versus M/s EASA Elevators Pvt. Ltd. respectively. Indisputably, the objections raised by the petitioners in this regard before the learned Labour Court are pending consideration and in view thereof, this Court does not deem it just and proper to preempt the consideration by the learned Labour Court. Confronted with the aforesaid situation, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw these writ petitions with a liberty to make a request to the learned Labour Court to decide its objections raised as to maintainability of the claim petitions before proceeding further in the matter. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed with liberty as aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. It goes without saying that if any such request is made/application is filed, the learned Labour Court is expected to decide it expeditiously in accordance with the law.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/23-25