1 (MCC No. 196 of 2021) 2025:CGHC:46242 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 196 of 2021 1 - Narhari Patel S/o Late Shri Jaiprasad Patel, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Bodapali, Tahsil Saraipali, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh --- Applicant(s) versus 1 - Mu. Temabai Wd/o Shriram, Aged About 51 Years R/o Village Boadpali, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 2 - Mu. Lagan Moti Wd/o Baliram, Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Boadapali, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 3 - Tikaslal S/o Meghnath, Aged About 61 Years (died and represented through LRs vide order dated 10.09.2025) 3(A) – Chhabilal Dadsena, S/o Tikaslal Dadsena, aged about 45 years R/o Village Risekela, Post - Kechhuwa Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 3(B) – Chandramani, S/o Tikaslal Dadsena, aged about 35 years R/o Village Risekela, Post – Kechhuwa, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 3(C) – Putalibai, D/o Tikaslal Dadsena, W/o Gayaram, aged about 38 years R/o Post – Bhaisadarha, Tahsil Jharband, District Bargarh Odisha 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Mahasamund , District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh --- Non-applicant(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2025.09.10 17:20:00 +0530 2 (MCC No. 196 of 2021) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant :- Mr. Rohishek Verma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vivek Verma, Advocate For Non-applicant-State:- Mr. R.S. Marhas, Addl. AG For Non-applicant Nos.1 & 2 :- Mr. Keshav Dewangan. Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 10.09.2025 1. Heard on IA No.2, which is an application filed for condonation of delay in filing IA No.1. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing IA No.1 is hereby condoned. 3. Also heard on IA No.1, which is an application for substitution of legal heirs of deceased non-applicant No.3. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Let the legal heirs of deceased non-applicant No.3 be brought on record during the course of the day. 5. With the consent of the parties, heard finally. 6. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of Second Appeal No.328/2012, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order of this Court dated 15.03.2021. 3 (MCC No. 196 of 2021) 7. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Second Appeal No.328/2012 is restored to its original number for its hearing and disposal in accordance with law. 8. Accordingly, this MCC is allowed. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!