Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12582 (AP)

A RAMASWAMY & ANOTHER, v. GIRIJAN COOP., CORP LTD., & 2 OTHERS,

WP/19202/2017 · 2025-07-20

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010148072017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19202/2017 Between: A Ramaswamy & Another, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Girijan Coop Corp Ltd 2 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA 2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP) The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondents in trying to retire the petitioners at the age of 58 years instead of 60 years is contrary to the provisions of Act 4 dated 27th June 2 2014 and contrary to the Judgment of the Honble Apex Court as illegal arbitrary against the principles of natural justice violative of Article 14 16 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and against the service rules and consequently to direct the Respondents to continue/ reinduct the petitioners up to 60 years of age and to pass...” 2. Sri MSP Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri Challa Srinivas Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Sri P.V.V.Satyanarayana, learned Standing Counsel for Girijan Corporation is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 21.07.2025. Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.19202 of 2017 21.07.2025 Asr