Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 125810 (ALL)

INSAD ALIAS BHAU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIFE SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

A482/1867/2025 · 2025-03-04

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13161 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1867 of 2025 Applicant :- Insad Alias Bhau Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chife Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant application has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and one personal bond for all two cases from the applicant and applicant has been granted bail in all cases by the court below. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in all two cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court below. He says that the applicant is very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant in District Ayodhya are as follows:- 1.Case Crime No. 27/2023, under Section 307/34 I.P.C., Police Station- Kowari Nagar, 2. Case Crime No. 16/2023, under Section 379, 411, 413, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench