MOHAMMAD AYUB CHATTOO AND ANR. v. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) AND ORS.
WP(C)/3129/2025 · 2025-12-15
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12581 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12581 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 10 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 3129/2025 CM(8385/2025) Mohammad Ayub Chattoo & Anr. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bilal Ahmad Khan, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory Through Financial Commissioner &Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Furqan Yaqub Sofi, GA.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 15.12.2025
01. After arguing for a while, Mr. Bilal Ahmad Khan,
learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would feel satisfied if the instant writ petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the respondent No. 3-Sub-Divisional Magistrate (West), Srinagar, to accord consideration to the application alleged to have been filed by the petitioners before him on 30th July, 2025, within some reasonable timeframe.
02. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Furqan Yaqub Sofi, learned Government Advocate enters appearance on behalf of respondents and is not averse to the disposal of the instant writ petition at this stage or else to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioners. However, he submits that the application of the petitioners would be considered in accordance with the rules and as per law occupying the field.
03. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the material on record.
04. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is taken up for final disposal at this stage as an innocuous prayer has been made by the
learned counsel for the petitioners and the same is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondent No. 3-Sub-Divisional Magistrate (West), Srinagar, to accord due consideration to the application alleged to have been filed by the petitioners before him on 30th July, 2025, by passing a speaking order, within a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with copy of writ petition and the annexures appended thereto, strictly in conformity with the rules and as per law.
05. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed by the respondent No. 3, be forwarded to the petitioner by registered post.
06. Writ petition disposed of along with connected application(s) in the manner as indicated above.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAG`AR: 15.12.2025
“HAMID”