Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1258 (PNJ)

KARAM CHAND AND OTHERS v. V UMASHANKAR AND OTHERS

COCP/6217/2025 · 2026-04-23

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[213] [1] Karam Cha Shri V. Um Union of I [2] Sita Ram an Shri V. Um Union of I Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] by the com [2] has not bee IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA COCP-621 Date of De m Chand and another versus V. Umashankar, Secretary, n of India and others COCP-621 Ram and others versus V. Umashankar, Secretary, n of India and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Chander Kant Rana, Advo Mr. Vikram Rathore, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Raghujeet Singh Madan, Mr. Mahender Joshi, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2 (in b Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, A **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the respondents e competent authority-CALA stands c Counsel for the petitioners ho een awarded as per statutory mand T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 6217-2025 (O&M) of Decision : 23.04.2026 …Petitioners ….Respondents 6218-2025 (O&M) …Petitioners ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate with vocate dan, Advocate for vocate (in both cases). Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. ents submits that the Award passed ands complied with. ers however submits that the interest mandate. assed terest RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.24 12:28 I agree to specified portions of this document COCP-6217-2025 (O&M) -2- [3] The present contempt petitions are disposed off. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to avail their remedies against the Award, if so advised, in accordance with law. [4] All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. [5] Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 23.04.2026 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.24 12:28 I agree to specified portions of this document