Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[213]
[1]
Karam Cha
Shri V. Um Union of I
[2]
Sita Ram an
Shri V. Um Union of I
Coram :
Present:
PANKAJ J
[1]
by the com [2]
has not bee
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA
COCP-621 Date of De
m Chand and another
versus V. Umashankar, Secretary, n of India and others
COCP-621
Ram and others
versus V. Umashankar, Secretary, n of India and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA
Mr. Chander Kant Rana, Advo Mr. Vikram Rathore, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Raghujeet Singh Madan, Mr. Mahender Joshi, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2 (in b
Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, A
****
KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the respondents e competent authority-CALA stands c
Counsel for the petitioners ho een awarded as per statutory mand T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 6217-2025 (O&M) of Decision : 23.04.2026
…Petitioners
….Respondents 6218-2025 (O&M)
…Petitioners
….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate with vocate dan, Advocate for vocate (in both cases). Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. ents submits that the Award passed ands complied with. ers however submits that the interest mandate.
assed terest RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.24 12:28 I agree to specified portions of this document
COCP-6217-2025 (O&M)
-2-
[3]
The present contempt petitions are disposed off. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to avail their remedies against the Award, if so advised, in accordance with law. [4]
All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands
disposed off. [5]
Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.
(PANKAJ JAIN)
JUDGE
23.04.2026 ‘R. Sharma'
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.24 12:28 I agree to specified portions of this document