VISHRAM BHARTI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WPIL/179/2025 · 2025-03-03
Pankaj Bhatia
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125754 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125754 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12487 Court No. - 7 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 179 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vishram Bharti Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Pratap Singh,Ayushi Dixit,Rudra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Hari Nath Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Present petition has been filed for the following relief:
"I. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the opp. parties, specially District Magistrate, Sultanpur to take strict action against the opp. party no.6 & 7 and get them evict them from plot No 326/0.0250 hec., 327/0.1580 hec & Plot No. 222/0.470 hec, situated at Village Sahinawa, Pargana-Chanda, Tehsil-Lambhua, District- Sultanpur, so as to serve the interest of justice."
3. Learned Standing Counsel, based upon instructions, states that two persons namely Opposite Party Nos.6 & 7 were found to be encroaching, thus, proceedings were initiated under Section 67(1) of U.P. Revenue Code and were decided against them, against which appeals were preferred which too have been dismissed.
4. It has been brought on record that two revisions have been filed by the said two persons which are pending consideration before Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya.
5. It is further recorded that two writ petitions were also instituted by the said persons; the documents on record indicate that the said writ petitions were
disposed off by this Court, as such, no two writ petitions, as stated, are pending.
6. Considering the fact that the revisions are pending at the instance of Opposite Party Nos.6 & 7 before the Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya, present petition is disposed off with direction to decide the pending revisions expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months.
7. After the decision is taken, further action in accordance with law shall follow.
Order Date :- 3.3.2025 nishant Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench