AJAY SAW ALIAS AJAY KUMAR SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3925/2025 · 2025-06-10
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12574 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12574 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:14949] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3925 of 2025
------ Ajay Saw @ Ajay Kumar Saw aged about 32 Years Son of Thanu Saw resident of Village Napo Khurd P.O. Barkagaon P.S. Barkagaon (O.P. Dadikalan) District Hazaribag.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 10-06-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection Barkagaon P.S. Case No.10 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103 (1) & 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, committed the murder of his wife. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Learned counsel for the petitioner files the certified copy of the charge with one head in respect of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner has been charged for the offences punishable under Section 108 of the B.N.S., 2023 only; even though there is no allegation of abatement of commission of suicide by the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.01.2025 as is evident from para-07 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Hazaribagh in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.10 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/