KUNCHALA YESUPADAM v. KUNCHALA YESTHER RANI & 7 OTHERS
CRP/2092/2016 · 2025-02-07
T C D Sekhar
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12571 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12571 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010148432016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2092/2016 Between: Kunchala Yesupadam ...PETITIONER AND Kunchala Yesther Rani 7 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T SAI SWAROOP Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following order:
The present revision is filed seeking direction to the execution Court not to finalize the proceedings in E.P.No.68 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Bapatla, pending disposal of I.A.No.340 of 2015, which was filed to set aside the ex parte decree dated 16.07.2013 in O.S.No.186 of
2010.
2. No representation for the petitioner.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the District Judiciary that the 1st respondent, who is the petitioner in EP No.60 of 2014, filed a memo stating that she has received all the documents from Judgment Debtors 5 & 6 and does not wish to prosecute the execution petition. The Execution Court, placing reliance on the memo filed by the petitioner/decree holder, closed the execution petition as not pressed by order dated 08.07.2016.
4. In that view of the matter, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
Dt.07.02.2025 KAS
113
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
C.R.P.No.2092 OF 2016 Date: 07.02.2025
KAS