MAMTA MISHRA AND 16 OTHERS v. SUNIL KUMAR AND 14 OTHERS
SAPL/37/2025 · 2025-02-28
Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125686 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125686 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12089 Court No. - 4 Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 37 of 2025 Appellant :- Mamta Mishra And 16 Others Respondent :- Sunil Kumar And 14 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Hari Om Rana,Santosh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Shaquiel Ahmad Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Shri Shaquiel Ahmad, learned counsel for respondent no.12/Caveator raised a preliminary objection that this appeal has been filed on behalf of dead persons as the appellants no.6 and 15 have died. Shri Hari Om Rana, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh after verifying the facts and impleading the proper parties. To which there is no objection by learned counsel for the respondent. In view of above, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as aforesaid. As prayed by learned counsel for the appellants certified copies annexed with the appeal shall be returned to learned counsel for the appellants after keeping photocopy on record. . .......................................(Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 28.2.2025 Banswar Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench