Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 125682 (ALL)

JITENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/2052/2025 · 2025-03-05

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13376-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2052 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jitendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimal Kishor Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sharad Tewari Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Vakalatnama filed today on behalf of opposite party no.7 by Shri Alok Yadav, Advocate, is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Vimal Kishor Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri Manish Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for opposite parties no. 1 to 5, Shri Shiv Prasad Kushwaha for opposite party no. 6 and Shri Alok Yadav for opposite party no.7. 3. The compensation in respect of the land in question has not been released by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for which earlier a writ petition, bearing Writ-C No. 4280 of 2022 : Sajivan Lal Vs. State of U.P. and others, was filed by opposite party no.7, wherein the Court was informed that the name of Sanjivan Lal had incorrectly been entered in the revenue records and a Committee has been constituted by the District Magistrate for enquiry, whereupon the writ petition was disposed of with a direction to conclude the said enquiry. The said enquiry has been concluded and its report is annexed as Annexure no.1 to the writ petition. Based on the said enquiry, proceedings for mutation under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 was decided in favour of opposite party no.7-Sanjivan Lal and accordingly, his name has been recorded in the revenue record. Being aggrieved, the petitioner herein has filed an appeal under Section 35 (2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is still pending. 4. The number of the said appeal, as informed by Counsel for the opposite party no.7, is 7721 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. T202410460507721) : Umesh Kumar and others Vs. Sanjivan Lal and others, which is pending before Sub- Divisional Officer, Tehsil Sarojinagar, Lucknow . 5. The petitioner is at liberty to inform the Special Land Acquisition Officer about the said fact, who will take it into consideration while considering for disbursement of compensation as per law, if it is relevant. The appellate Court i.e. Sub-Divisonal Officer, Tehsil Sarojinagar, Lucknow, is directed to decide the said appeal at the earliest say within two months from the date of receipt a certified copy of this order. 6. Shri Manish Mishra, learned Sanding Counsel for the State shall communicate this order to thee appellate authority. 7. The writ petition stands disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Ajit Digitally signed by :- AJIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench