Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:15961 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S). No. 2178 of 2018
---------- Md. Soyab, aged about 38 years, son of Md. Yunus, resident of Laldih Colony, P.O. & P.S. Ghatshila, District East Singhbhum (Pin-832303).
…. Petitioner Versus
1. State of Jharkhand
2. Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, District East Singhbhum.
3. Sub Registrar, Ghatshila, P.O. & P.S. Ghatshila, District East Singhbhum.
………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
----------- For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Mithilesh Singh, GA-IV
Mr. Vishal Kr. Rai, AC to GA-IV
---------- 06/ 18.06.2025 Heard learned counsel for the respondents. None appears for the petitioner.
2. Petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondent- authorities for payment of admitted outstanding dues accrued on account of service rendered by the petitioner since last 20 years in the Revenue Department.
3. From the records it appears that the petitioner was terminated in the year 1997. Thereafter, he preferred a writ application being W.P.(S). No. 5072 of 2005, which stood dismissed. The same was challenged in appeal being LPA No. 375 of 2006, which was also dismissed on 16.10.2006. Thereafter, the petitioner slept over the matter and all of a sudden filed this writ application in the year 2018. No ground, whatsoever, has been assigned in the entire averments as to what amount the petitioner is entitled for.
2025:JHHC:15961 2
4. In these peculiar facts and circumstances of the case; on the one hand, the alleged claim is of the year 1997 and after more than 20 years, he has preferred this writ application and on the other hand, he was having opportunity for making the prayer in the earlier writ application also; coupled with the fact that no one is here to represent the petitioner to assist the Court; the instant writ application stands dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned respondents, if so advised, showing the documents for his claim, so that his claim can be considered in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations.
5. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) kunal/-