1 / 3 2025:CGHC:12760-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 150 of 2025 Manpreet Kaur D/o Late Kulwant Singh Aged About 32 Years R/o 1 B / 79, 1 B Colony, Ward No. 12, Near D.A.V. School, Vishrampur, Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Home Affairs Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Inspector General Of Police Sarguja Range, Ambikapur, Sarguja, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh. 3 - Superintendent Of Police Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Station House Officer Police Station Vishrampur, Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Parth Chatterjee Posted As Personal Manage, S.E.C.L, Vishrampur, R/o 2 A Colony, Vishrampur, Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Gyan Prakash Shukla, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri R avindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN 2 / 3 Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 18/03/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “10.1. That, the records pertaining to the case of the petitioner, may be kindly called for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the respondents to register a First Information Report upon the complaints of the petitioner and respondent authorities may be kindly directed by the Hon'ble Court to investigate the entire set of allegations levelled by petitioner against the private respondent, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the respondents authority to follow the guidelines as per the judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) 6 SCC 241” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite several complaints have been made, no action has been taken by the State/ respondents. 3. We have perused the prayers and pleadings made in the writ petition. 4. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has submitted that the grievance of the petitioner can be very well redressed before the Court 3 / 3 below by filing an application under Section 156 (3) or under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. (now, under Section 175(3) or under Section 223 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023). He further submits that the controversy involved in the present matter has already been decided by the High Court of Allahabad in Misc. Bench No. 24492 of 2020 : Waseem Haider Vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, Home Others vide judgment and order dated 14.12.2020 as well as by this Court in WPCR No.333 of 2020 (Akhilesh Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 12.04.2023, dismissing the said petition, hence, the present petition be also dismissed in terms of the said order. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate Forum. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice ved