IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.6887 of 2025 Date of Decision:28.04.2025 _______________________________________________________ Dr. Deo Prakash Pandey …….Petitioner Versus Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar HP Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, & another … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Tanuj Thakur, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Since, it is quite apparent from the pleadings as well as documents adduced on record by the petitioner himself that he has been transferred from one Department of respondent-University to another Department, there appears to be no justification to interfere in the impugned transfer order dated 01.02.2025. However, having taken note of the fact that petitioner is expert in the field of Rice Wheat Research, coupled with the fact that he has already filed representation dated 14.02.2025 (Annexure P-3) to the competent authority for cancellation of his transfer from RWRC Malan to another Department, this Court without going into the merits of the 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 case, deems it fit to dispose of the present petition, with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide pending representation dated 14.02.2025 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner, if not already decided, expeditiously, preferably within a period of ten days. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall also afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and pass appropriate order taking note of the fact that services, if any, rendered by the petitioner at previous place of posting would be more beneficial for university on account of his having experties in that field. Till the time representation is not decided, petitioner shall not be compelled to give charge of his previous Department, if not a already given. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge April 28, 2025 (shankar)