Manoranjan Debbarma v. The State of Tripura and 4 others
WP(C)/567/2024 · 2025-07-17
S Datta Purkayastha
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1256 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1256 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
WP(C) No.567 of 2024
Sri Manoranjan Debbarma
….Petitioner(s) Versus
The State of Tripura & 4 Ors.
….Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kawsik Nath, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : Mrs.Pinki Chakraborty, Advocate.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
ORDER
17.07.2025
Heard Ld. Counsel of both sides. Ld. Counsel Mr. Kawsik Nath for the petitioner submits that already the petitioner has gone on retirement and therefore the writ petition has become infractuous. The petitioner has challenged the seniority list in the instant writ petition along with claim for his promotion to the post of Director of Education Department. Ld. Counsel Mr. Nath further submits that the case may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh writ petition in view of the changed circumstances. Considered the submission. Leave as sought for is allowed. The Writ Petition is disposed of being not pressed.
JUDGE
Saikat Sarma