Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12558 (UTT)

MUKESH SAHANI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2352/2021 · 2025-08-04

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2352 of 2021 With WPCRL No.2331 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Mani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner in WPCRL No.2352/2021. 2. None appears for the petitioner in WPCRL No.2331/2021. 3. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA along with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 4. Learned State Counsel supplied instructions dated 15.07.2025 to the Court, which are taken on record. On instructions, he submits that after investigation, charge- sheet has been submitted against the petitioners, namely, Mukesh Sahani and Rakesh on 21.10.2022. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would advice his client to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings. 6. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, both the writ petitions have rendered infructuous and the same are accordingly dismissed as such. 7. However, it is open to the charge-sheeted petitioners to challenge the charge-sheet, if so advised, in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. 8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 04.08.2025 AK