Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 125577 (ALL)

MANISH KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. LKO. AND 10 OTHERS

WRIC/1927/2025 · 2025-03-06

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13849-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1927 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manish Kumar Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raghvendra P. Singh,Satyendra Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Vakalatnamas filed on behalf of opposite parties no. 8, 9, 10 and 11 by Mr. Shobhnath Pandey and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned Advocates are taken on record. 2. Heard. 3. In response to the writ petition, learned standing counsel has received instructions to the effect that there was encroachment on the chak road which has been removed, however, Mr. Shobhnath Pandey, learned counsel for opposite party no. 8 submits that his client is bhumidhari of gata bearing no. 364 and his application for demarcation is not being entertained. If any such application for demarcation is filed, unless there is any legal impediment, the competent authority/Court should take cognizance of the matter and take such decision as may be permissible in law. As regards levelling/macadamization of the chak road, as claimed, is concerned, the same is a matter to be seen by the official opposite parties for which we grant liberty to the petitioners to approach them as per law. 4. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench