IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.R. No. 32 of 2025 Decided on: 09.05.2025 Desh Raj …Petitioner. Versus Ajay Kumar and Anr. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate. For the respondent : Nemo. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition as well as application (Annexure P-3) with liberty to file afresh before learned Trial Court providing reasons for not being able to deposit the amount of cost in terms of order dated 05.11.2024. 2. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:13264 ) 3. Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty as prayed. 4. It is clarified that in case a fresh application seeking deposit of amount of cost is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided afresh by learned Trial Court on its own merit. 5. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application, if any. (Satyen Vaidya) 9th May, 2025 Judge (sushma)