Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12555 (UTT)

GURBACHAN SINGH AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1154/2024 · 2025-06-17

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 1154 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Arjun Arora, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Ms. Poonam Rauthan, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. A short counter affidavit along with delay condonation application is filed by the State. Cause shown is found sufficient. Delay is condoned. The delay condonation application (IA No. 2 of 2025) is allowed. The short counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. 5. Learned State Counsel made a statement at the Bar that after investigation the charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioners on 23.03.2025. Therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition, and it has become infructuous. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that he would challenge the said charge-sheet in the appropriate proceedings before the competent forum. 7. In view of the statements made by the learned counsel for the parties, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, it is open to the petitioners to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. 8. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 17.06.2025 Mamta