Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12554 (CHH)

CHANDRA PRAKASH SHARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2029/2023 · 2025-09-02

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:44962 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2029 of 2023 1 - Chandra Prakash Sharma S/o Late Shri K. N. Sharma Aged About 50 Years R/o Gypsy 27, Ganpati Vihar Borsi, Police Station Pulgaon, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Directorate Of Women And Child Development Department, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Committee Of Senior Secretaries Of State Government Of Chhattisgarh For Transfer Cancellation/correction New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanmoy Choudhary, Advocate on behalf of Mr. T. K. Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 03/09/2025 1. This petition is preferred against orders dated 29.09.2022 and 16.02.2023. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 reliefs:- "10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus as to quash the transfer order dated 29/09/2022 (Annexure P-1) and order dated 16/02/2023 (Annexure P-7) passed by the respondent no.3. 10.2 That, any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in favor of the petitioner may kindly be passed." 3. Vide order dated 23.03.2023, the petitioner was granted stay by this Court. 4. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter and considering the fact that on the strength of the aforesaid stay order, the petitioner is still continuing at his original place of posting, as such, by the afflux of time the said orders, has lost its efficacy and as such the order(s) dated 29.09.2022 and 16.02.2023 are required to be quashed and accordingly the said order under challenge is hereby quashed. 5. However, liberty is granted to the respondent State authorities to pass appropriate orders in respect of transfer of the petitioner, in case exigency arises, without being influenced by this order. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena