Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12553 (AP)

The Government of Andhra Pradesh v. Dr. R Damodara Reddy

WP/25025/2015 · 2025-01-21

Challa Gunaranjan, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 25025 OF 2015 Between: 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, (HM & FW) Department. Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The Director of Public Health in the office of the Director, of Medical & Health, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3. The Commissioner of A. P., Viadya Vidhana Parishad, Andhra Pradesh, Koti, Hyderabad. (Petitioner 1 is amended as per Court Order dt. 31/07/2015) ...PETITIONERS AND 1. Dr. R Damodara Reddy, S/o, R. Koti Reddy. Civil Asst. Surgeon, Area Hospital, Tadepalligudem, West Godavri District, R/o. 3-2-28/1, Daledar Street, Subbaraopet, Tadepalligudem, West Godavri District 2. The A.P. Administrative Tribunal., rep. by its Registrar, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of "WRIT OF CERTIORARI" calling for the records relating to and connected with the orders of the Hon'ble Andhra Y Pradesh Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad dated 26-04-2012 in O.A.No.3330 of 2012 and to quash or set aside the same by holding as erroneous and contrary to law. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 32482 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders dated 26-04- 2012 in O.A.No.3330 of 2012 on the file of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad including all further proceedings relating thereto pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: AGP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI EATHAKOTA VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.2: -— The Court made the following: ORDER % THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN y WRIT PETITION NO: 25025/2015 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) Heard Sri R.S.Manidhar Pingali, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services I, appearing for the petitioners and Sri E.Venkata Rao, learned counsel for the 1®' respondent. The 1®' respondent herein filed O.A.No.3330 of 2012 in Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, which was allowed in 2. terms of the orders passed by the Tribunal in O.A.No.1807 of 2012 dated 30.03.2012. 3. The present writ petition is filed challenging the order dated 26.04.2012 in O.A.No.3330 of 2012. 4. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit and a memo to St that effect has been also filed by the learned counsel for the 1 I li respondent that the present petitioners. Government of Andhra li Pradesh and others, challenged the order dated 30.03.2012 in O.A.No.1807 of 2012 in W.P.No.21086 of 2012. The said writ petition along with the connected matters was dismissed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, on 20.11.2018. The said order attained finality. The Government of Andhra Pradesh has also implemented the order of 2 the Tribunal by issuing G.O.Rt.No.130, dated 25.02.2022, copy of which has been annexed along with the memo. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly submits that the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of the Coordinate Bench in W.P.No.21086 of 2012 dated 20.11.2018. 6. We also find no reason to interfere with the impugned order of the Tribunal passed in O.As filed by the applicant/respondent. 7. The Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. The petitioners shall pay arrears of pension and benefits to the 1®* respondent/applicant within a period of eight weeks from the date of 8. copy of this order is received, in terms of the order of the Tribunal. 9. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any pending. shall also stand closed. SD/-G.HELANAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ' SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To 1. Two CCs to GP for Services I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT 2. One CC to Sri Eathakota Venkata Rao Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies TF HIGH COURT DATED:21/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.25025 of 2015 I" l7FEB2C2j I] ^ . Current Section ^ DISMISSING THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS