SOFIA KHATUN ALIAS SOFIA BEGUM v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
I.A.(Civil)/1602/2025 · 2025-05-27
Kalyan Rai Surana, Malasri Nandi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12552 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12552 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010105402025
2025:GAU-AS:6906-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1602/2025 SOFIA KHATUN ALIAS SOFIA BEGUM D/O- LATE AGAR ALI, W/O- SHAHAR ALI, R/O- VILLAGE- KUJARPITH, P.S.- HOWLY, DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781301. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS THROUGH THE SECRETARY, TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GRIHA MANTRALAYA, NEW DELHI. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH THE SECRETARY
TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006. 3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA
NIRVACHAN SADAN ASHOKA ROAD
NEW DELHI- 110001. 4:THE STATE COORDINATOR NATIONAL REGISTRATION OF CITIZEN ASSAM BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781005. Page No.# 2/3 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BAJALI P.O.- BAJALI DISTRICT- BAJALI
ASSAM PIN CODE- 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER) BAJALI P.O.- BAJALI DISTRICT- BAJALI
ASSAM PIN CODE Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. F A HASSAN, MS. U NANDA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM,SC, F.T,SC, ECI
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI ORDER Date : 28.05.2025 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Ms. U. Nanda, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S.P. Choudhury, learned CGC; Ms. P. Barua, learned standing counsel for the ECI; Mr. G. Shrama, learned standing counsel for the FT matters; and Mr. P. Sarmah, learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate for the State respondent. 2. By filing this interlocutory application, the applicant who is the petitioner in the connected WP(C) 6490/2024, prayed for impleading the District Commissioner, Barpeta and Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta as respondent nos. 7 and 8. 3. The learned standing counsel for the FT matters has submitted that
Page No.# 3/3 the authority which is impleaded as respondent no.5 in the connected writ petition also does not exist. 4. Considering, the prayer made in this interlocutory application stands allowed and District Commissioner, Barpeta and Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta allowed to be impleaded as respondent nos.7 and 8 in the connected writ petition. 5. The learned counsel for the applicant is also directed to submit an amended copy of the cause-title in respect of respondent no.5 by substituting it with the correct authority. 6.
The same shall be done by providing a amended copy of the cause- title of this interlocutory application as well as in the connected writ petition to the AO(J), FT Section within 2(two) working days. 7. Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands allowed and closed. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant